An argument in favor of recycling to preserve the environment

Some people think high population density lies at the root of poverty in developing nations such as China and those in sub-Saharan Africa. It is tempting to say that we must not politicize this or any other environmental issue, and we do not intend to do so; our focus is on sound science rooted in a value structure that emphasizes honesty and openness to debate and evidence.

In fact, these and other data indicate that the number of recorded extinctions for both plants and animals is very small. What the poor lack is sufficient income to afford the solutions; that is part of why economic growth in developing countries and trade between nations which can speed the adoption of environmentally friendly technologies, management techniques, and regulatory regimes in developing countries are so critically important—and why it is so tragic that many environmentalists embrace policies inimical to these ends.

It needs to think less about the present and begin the more difficult task of addressing long-term solutions — solutions that will require careful attention to good science.

Christians and the Environment: How Should Christians Think about the Environment?

While population grew by 19 percent from tothe index of air pollution fell by 53 percent. Economic demographer Mikhail Bernstam explains: But the data—to the extent that both sets are to be trusted—now show the opposite to be true.

This leads them to think that any person who disagrees with them does so because of some moral or intellectual failing. In Southern Africa and other parts of the world, conservation of biological resources would be a profitable activity and not a cost if the correct institutional arrangements were developed, including a stronger reliance on private property and communal tenure systems.

But in a system where the optimum level of environmental protection is decided by a market, influence is wielded by the wealthy—those with most market power. Many citizens who support expensive policies to prevent species extinctions might reconsider if they knew that rather than preventing real extinctions, they were only preventing the removal of a geographically defined segment of an otherwise thriving species.

But even there, few were schooled for more than five or six years, and only a tiny percentage attended college, let alone graduated. Further support comes from the albeit limited record of annual ice accumulation in polar ice sheets [5].

Should We Recycle?

The usefulness of economic theory can be pushed too far. The group known as the Greens is the most politically sophisticated, a fact that explains the care they take to hide their true agenda from the public. Therefore, we need to examine more closely what is institutionally necessary to help further the goal of environmental protection.

Methane a more potent greenhouse gas is produced during landfill. Some of the most desirable places to live in the world are also among the most densely populated. Finally, I agree with Nash that we must avoid hysteria. When the claims are tested, they are found to be highly dubious.

In fact, the costs of added growth are climbing quite rapidly as the pressures against certain resources, and on the environment as a whole, increase.

Most of all, in dealing with our stewardship responsibility for creation, we must acknowledge Jesus Christ as Lord of creation by what we say and sing, and also by what we do. Even more significant, the price of resources divided by wages is even more sharply downward, because while resource prices have been falling, wages have been rising.

Rates of population growth offer scarcely more reliable guidance for the concept of "overpopulation. Before the Reformation, few countries had widespread education, and even afterward, schooling was available principally to the rich.

But when people are confident that their most urgent needs will be met, they begin allocating more of their resources to needs deemed by them less urgent—including increasingly rigorous environmental protection. Six-figure salaries abound in the offices of these organizations. First, the Bible presents human multiplication as a blessing, not a curse Gen.

For these indicators the environmental transition is at, or close to, zero.

5 Reasons Why People Don’t Recycle and 5 Reasons They Should

Trends in pollution basically derive from trends in resource use and, more broadly, trends in production practices under different economic systems. Augustine in Alaska These findings suggest that—under current conditions—evaporation from the ocean with subsequent deposition on the ice caps, principally in the Antarctic, is more important in determining sea-level changes than the melting of glaciers and thermal expansion of ocean water.

Why We Should Recycle

Are there good reasons for these fears? Christian earthkeepers are environmentalists Conflation of Earthkeeping with Environmentalism. In spite of the clear message from a careful reading of this and other Scriptures, critics have gained currency….

Tragically, however, people with a strong environmental consciousness who live predominantly in Western countries sometimes seek to impose their own environmental sensibilities on people still struggling to survive.

It is obvious that the great advance in wealth over the past century has taken place only in a small proportion of countries, namely, the liberal democracies and free economies of the West.

The germ theory of disease did not become current until the late eighteenth century, and the use of antiseptics did not begin until half a century later, with the work of the British Christian and chemist, Joseph Lister.

The consensus of scientists on global warming has turned out to be quite the opposite of what the apocalyptic vision proponents claimed.2 Summary While environmental sustainability is an integral part of the Lisbon strategy, protection of the environment and economic growth are often seen as competing dfaduke.coments of tighter environmental regulation challenge this.

Should We Recycle? We Should Recycle. Side Score: We Should't Recycle. Side Score: 5. Add New Argument. I think it is very important for the environment, so YES we should recycle!

This is important because it helps to preserve materials, such as plastics and metals, so that they don't run out as fast.

If we resumed using up the. Port Manteaux churns out silly new words when you feed it an idea or two. Enter a word (or two) above and you'll get back a bunch of portmanteaux created by jamming together words that are conceptually related to your inputs.

For example, enter "giraffe" and you'll. An Argument in Favor of Recycling to Preserve the Environment PAGES 1. WORDS View Full Essay. More essays like this: Not sure what I'd do without @Kibin - Alfredo Alvarez, student @ Miami University.

Exactly what I needed. - Jenna Kraig, student @ UCLA.

Should We Recycle?

Wow. Most helpful essay resource ever! On the basis of a biblical worldview and ethics, as well as of sound science, economics, and public policy principles, we believe sound environmental stewardship celebrates and promotes human life, freedom, and economic development as compatible with, even essential for, the good of the whole environment.

The most notable benefit of recycling is the reduction in the size of landfills, and the need for them all together. This, in turn, helps us preserve our wildlife and .

An argument in favor of recycling to preserve the environment
Rated 0/5 based on 66 review